Heterologous prime-boost immunisation with mRNA- and AdC68-based 2019-nCoV variant vaccines induces broad-spectrum immune responses in mice.

The ongoing evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 or 2019-nCoV) variants has been associated with the transmission and pathogenicity of COVID-19. Therefore, exploring the optimal immunisation strategy to improve the broad-spectrum cross-protection ability of COVID-19 vaccines is of great significance. Herein, we assessed different heterologous prime-boost strategies with chimpanzee adenovirus vector-based COVID-19 vaccines plus Wuhan-Hu-1 (WH-1) strain (AdW) and Beta variant (AdB) and mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines plus WH-1 strain (ARW) and Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant (ARO) in 6-week-old female BALB/c mice. AdW and AdB were administered intramuscularly or intranasally, while ARW and ARO were administered intramuscularly. Intranasal or intramuscular vaccination with AdB followed by ARO booster exhibited the highest levels of cross-reactive IgG, pseudovirus-neutralising antibody (PNAb) responses, and angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2)-binding inhibition rates against different 2019-nCoV variants among all vaccination groups. Moreover, intranasal AdB vaccination followed by ARO induced higher levels of IgA and neutralising antibody responses against live 2019-nCoV than intramuscular AdB vaccination followed by ARO. A single dose of AdB administered intranasally or intramuscularly induced broader cross-NAb responses than AdW. Th1-biased cellular immune response was induced in all vaccination groups. Intramuscular vaccination-only groups exhibited higher levels of Th1 cytokines than intranasal vaccination-only and intranasal vaccination-containing groups. However, no obvious differences were found in the levels of Th2 cytokines between the control and all vaccination groups. Our findings provide a basis for exploring vaccination strategies against different 2019-nCoV variants to achieve high broad-spectrum immune efficacy.

Safety and immunogenicity of a protein subunit COVID-19 vaccine (ZF2001) in healthy children and adolescents aged 3-17 years in China: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial and an open-label, non-randomised, non-inferiority, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: ZF2001 is a recombinant protein subunit vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 that has been approved for use in China, Colombia, Indonesia, and Uzbekistan in adults aged 18 years or older, but not yet in children and adolescents younger than 18 years. We aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of ZF2001 in children and adolescents aged 3-17 years in China. METHODS: The randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial and the open-label, non-randomised, non-inferiority, phase 2 trial were done at the Xiangtan Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Hunan Province, China). Healthy children and adolescents aged 3-17 years, without a history of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, without a history of COVID-19, without COVID-19 at the time of the study, and without contact with patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 were included in the phase 1 and phase 2 trials. In the phase 1 trial, participants were divided into three groups according to age (3-5 years, 6-11 years, and 12-17 years). Each group was randomly assigned (4:1), using block randomisation with five blocks, each with a block size of five, to receive three 25 µg doses of the vaccine, ZF2001, or placebo intramuscularly in the arm 30 days apart. The participants and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. In the phase 2 trial, participants received three 25 µg doses of ZF2001 30 days apart and remained stratified by age group. For phase 1, the primary endpoint was safety and the secondary endpoint was immunogenicity (humoral immune response on day 30 after the third vaccine dose: geometric mean titre [GMT] of prototype SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibodies and seroconversion rate, and geometric mean concentration [GMC] of prototype SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain [RBD]-binding IgG antibodies and seroconversion rate). For phase 2, the primary endpoint was the GMT of SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibodies with seroconversion rate on day 14 after the third vaccine dose, and the secondary endpoints included the GMT of RBD-binding antibodies and seroconversion rate on day 14 after the third vaccine dose, the GMT of neutralising antibodies against the omicron BA.2 subvariant and seroconversion rate on day 14 after the third vaccine dose, and safety. Safety was analysed in participants who received at least one dose of the vaccine or placebo. Immunogenicity was analysed in the full-analysis set (ie, participants who received at least one dose and had antibody results) by intention to treat and in the per-protocol set (ie, participants who completed the whole vaccination course and had antibody results). Non-inferiority in the phase 2 trial (neutralising antibody titre of participants from this trial aged 3-17 years vs that of participants aged 18-59 years from a separate phase 3 trial) for clinical outcome assessment was based on the geometric mean ratio (GMR) and was considered met if the lower bound of the 95% CI for the GMR was 0·67 or greater. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04961359 (phase 1) and NCT05109598 (phase 2). FINDINGS: Between July 10 and Sept 4, 2021, 75 children and adolescents were randomly assigned to receive ZF2001 (n=60) or placebo (n=15) in the phase 1 trial and were included in safety and immunogenicity analyses. Between Nov 5, 2021, and Feb 14, 2022, 400 participants (130 aged 3-7 years, 210 aged 6-11 years, and 60 aged 12-17 years) were included in the phase 2 trial and were included in the safety analysis; six participants were excluded from the immunogenicity analyses. 25 (42%) of 60 participants in the ZF2001 group and seven (47%) of 15 participants in the placebo group in phase 1, and 179 (45%) of 400 participants in phase 2, had adverse events within 30 days after the third vaccination, without a significant difference between groups in phase 1. Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2 (73 [97%] of 75 in the phase 1 trial, and 391 [98%] of 400 in the phase 2 trial). One participant in the phase 1 trial and three in the phase 2 trial who received ZF2001 had serious adverse events. One serious adverse event (acute allergic dermatitis) in the phase 2 trial was possibly related to the vaccine. In the phase 1 trial, on day 30 after the third dose, in the ZF2001 group, seroconversion of neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 was observed in 56 (93%; 95% CI 84-98) of 60 participants, with a GMT of 176·5 (95% CI 118·6-262·8), and seroconversion of RBD-binding antibodies was observed in all 60 (100%; 95% CI 94-100) participants, with a GMC of 47·7 IU/mL (95% CI 40·1-56·6). In the phase 2 trial, on day 14 after the third dose, seroconversion of neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 was seen in 392 (99%; 95% CI 98-100) participants, with a GMT of 245·4 (95% CI 220·0-273·7), and seroconversion of RBD-binding antibodies was observed in all 394 (100%; 99-100) participants, with a GMT of 8021 (7366-8734). On day 14 after the third dose, seroconversion of neutralising antibodies against the omicron subvariant BA.2 was observed in 375 (95%; 95% CI 93-97) of 394 participants, with a GMT of 42·9 (95% CI 37·9-48·5). For the non-inferiority comparison of participants aged 3-17 years with those aged 18-59 years for SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibodies, the adjusted GMR was 8·6 (95% CI 7·0-10·4), with the lower bound of the GMR greater than 0·67. INTERPRETATION: ZF2001 is safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic in children and adolescents aged 3-17 years. Vaccine-elicited sera can neutralise the omicron BA.2 subvariant, but with reduced activity. The results support further studies of ZF2001 in children and adolescents. FUNDING: Anhui Zhifei Longcom Biopharmaceutical and the Excellent Young Scientist Program from National Natural Science Foundation of China. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Safety and immunogenicity following a homologous booster dose of CoronaVac in children and adolescents.

Data on safety and immunity elicited by a third booster dose of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine in children and adolescents are scarce. Here we conducted a study based on a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial (NCT04551547) to assess the safety and immunogenicity of a third dose of CoronaVac. In this study, 384 participants in the vaccine group were assigned to two cohorts. One received the third dose at a 10-months interval (cohort 1) and the other one at a 12-months interval (cohort 2). The primary endpoint is safety and immunogenicity following a third dose of CoronaVac. The secondary endpoint is antibody persistence following the primary two-dose schedule. Severities of local and systemic adverse reactions reported within 28 days after dose 3 were mild and moderate in both cohorts. A third dose of CoronaVac increased GMTs to 681.0 (95%CI: 545.2-850.7) in cohort 1 and 745.2 (95%CI: 577.0-962.3) in cohort 2. Seropositivity rates against the prototype were 100% on day 28 after dose 3. Seropositivity rates against the Omicron variant were 90.6% (cohort 1) and 91.5% (cohort 2). A homologous booster dose of CoronaVac is safe and induces a significant neutralising antibody levels increase in children and adolescents.

Efficacy and Safety of the RBD-Dimer-Based Covid-19 Vaccine ZF2001 in Adults.

BACKGROUND: The ZF2001 vaccine, which contains a dimeric form of the receptor-binding domain of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and aluminum hydroxide as an adjuvant, was shown to be safe, with an acceptable side-effect profile, and immunogenic in adults in phase 1 and 2 clinical trials. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial to investigate the efficacy and confirm the safety of ZF2001. The trial was performed at 31 clinical centers across Uzbekistan, Indonesia, Pakistan, and Ecuador; an additional center in China was included in the safety analysis only. Adult participants (≥18 years of age) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a total of three 25-µg doses (30 days apart) of ZF2001 or placebo. The primary end point was the occurrence of symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), as confirmed on polymerase-chain-reaction assay, at least 7 days after receipt of the third dose. A key secondary efficacy end point was the occurrence of severe-to-critical Covid-19 (including Covid-19-related death) at least 7 days after receipt of the third dose. RESULTS: Between December 12, 2020, and December 15, 2021, a total of 28,873 participants received at least one dose of ZF2001 or placebo and were included in the safety analysis; 25,193 participants who had completed the three-dose regimen, for whom there were approximately 6 months of follow-up data, were included in the updated primary efficacy analysis that was conducted at the second data cutoff date of December 15, 2021. In the updated analysis, primary end-point cases were reported in 158 of 12,625 participants in the ZF2001 group and in 580 of 12,568 participants in the placebo group, for a vaccine efficacy of 75.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71.0 to 79.8). Severe-to-critical Covid-19 occurred in 6 participants in the ZF2001 group and in 43 in the placebo group, for a vaccine efficacy of 87.6% (95% CI, 70.6 to 95.7); Covid-19-related death occurred in 2 and 12 participants, respectively, for a vaccine efficacy of 86.5% (95% CI, 38.9 to 98.5). The incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events was balanced in the two groups, and there were no vaccine-related deaths. Most adverse reactions (98.5%) were of grade 1 or 2. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of adults, the ZF2001 vaccine was shown to be safe and effective against symptomatic and severe-to-critical Covid-19 for at least 6 months after full vaccination. (Funded by the National Science and Technology Major Project and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04646590.).